Journal of Public Health Advance Access published online on June 19, 2009
Journal of Public Health, doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdp061
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Geographical variation in the provision of elective primary hip and knee replacement: the role of socio-demographic, hospital and distance variables
Andy Judge, Research Associate1
Nicky J. Welton, Senior Research Fellow2
Jat Sandhu, Clinical Assistant Professor1,3
Yoav Ben-Shlomo, Professor of Clinical Epidemiology1
1 Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol BS8 2PS, UK
2 Academic Unit of Primary Health Care, Department of Community Based Medicine, University of Bristol, Cotham House, Cotham Hill, Bristol BS6 6JL, UK
3 School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, 8th Floor, 601 West Broadway, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V5Z 4C2
Address correspondence to Andy Judge, E-mail: andrew.judge{at}bristol.ac.uk
| Abstract |
|---|
Background To explore inequalities in the provision of hip/knee replacement surgery and produce small-area estimates of provision to inform local health planning.
Methods Hospital Episode Statistics were used to explore inequalities in the provision of primary hip/knee operations in English NHS hospitals in 2002. Multilevel Poisson regression modelling was used to estimate rates of surgical provision by socio-demographic, hospital and distance variables. GIS software was used to estimate road travel times and create hospital catchment areas.
Results Rates of joint replacement increased with age before falling in those aged 80+. Women received more operations than men. People living in the most deprived areas obtained fewer hip, but more knee operations. Those in urban areas received less hip surgery, but there was no association for knee replacement. Controlling for hospital and distance measures did not attenuate the effects. Geographical variation across districts was observed with some districts showing inequality in socio-demographic factors, whereas others showed none at all.
Conclusions This study found evidence of inequalities in the provision of joint replacement surgery. However, before we can conclude that there is inequity in receipts of healthcare, future research must consider whether these patterns are explained by variations in need across socio-demographic groups.
Keywords: access, geographical variation, hip replacement, hospital admission, inequality, knee replacement