<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org">
<title>Journal of Public Health - current issue</title>
<link>http://jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org</link>
<description>Journal of Public Health - RSS feed of current issue</description>
<prism:eIssn>1741-3850</prism:eIssn>
<prism:coverDisplayDate>December 2009</prism:coverDisplayDate>
<prism:publicationName>Journal of Public Health</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>1741-3842</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/4/461?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/4/462?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/4/466?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/4/468?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/4/470?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/4/472?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/4/478?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/4/490?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/4/496?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/4/506?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/4/512?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/4/521?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/4/530?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/4/541?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/4/546?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/4/554?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/4/561?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/4/566?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/4/573?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/4/582?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/4/589?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/4/593?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/4/596?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/4/599?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/4/599-a?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
</channel>

<item rdf:about="http://jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/4/461?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Evidence for public health practice]]></title>
<link>http://jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/4/461?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gray, S., Leung, G. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 06:43:00 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/pubmed/fdp113</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Evidence for public health practice]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Faculty of Public Health of the Royal Colleges of Physicians of the United Kingdom</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>31</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>461</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>461</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorial</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/4/462?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Trust, terrorism and public health]]></title>
<link>http://jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/4/462?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Policies to promote public health are based on trust. There is a danger that public trust may be lost, especially where policies are seen to be influenced by vested interests or conflict with available evidence. Although trust in public health policies in the UK is high, some commentators have questioned recent responses to the threat of pandemic flu, suggesting that they may be driven, in part, by those seeking to profit from health scares, and drawing a direct comparison with terrorist scares. We argue that the approach to evidence by the public health and counter-terrorist communities differ markedly. Public health professionals must ensure that their actions do not undermine their credibility, in particular those involved in response to the threat of bioterrorism.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[McKee, M., Coker, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 06:43:00 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/pubmed/fdp091</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Trust, terrorism and public health]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Faculty of Public Health of the Royal Colleges of Physicians of the United Kingdom</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>31</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>465</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>462</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Perspectives</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/4/466?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The influence of SARS on perceptions of risk and reality]]></title>
<link>http://jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/4/466?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Griffiths, S., Lau, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 06:43:00 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/pubmed/fdp094</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The influence of SARS on perceptions of risk and reality]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Faculty of Public Health of the Royal Colleges of Physicians of the United Kingdom</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>31</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>467</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>466</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Perspectives</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/4/468?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Public trust is necessary to protect the population from threats to public health]]></title>
<link>http://jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/4/468?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Oliver, I., Lewis, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 06:43:00 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/pubmed/fdp097</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Public trust is necessary to protect the population from threats to public health]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Faculty of Public Health of the Royal Colleges of Physicians of the United Kingdom</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>31</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>469</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>468</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Perspectives</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/4/470?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Trust me, I am a policy maker]]></title>
<link>http://jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/4/470?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Burls, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 06:43:00 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/pubmed/fdp098</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Trust me, I am a policy maker]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Faculty of Public Health of the Royal Colleges of Physicians of the United Kingdom</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>31</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>471</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>470</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Perspectives</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/4/472?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Licence to be active: parental concerns and 10-11-year-old children's ability to be independently physically active]]></title>
<link>http://jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/4/472?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Physical activity independent of adult supervision is an important component of youth physical activity. This study examined parental attitudes to independent activity, factors that limit licence to be independently active and parental strategies to facilitate independent activity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>In-depth phone interviews were conducted with 24 parents (4 males) of 10&ndash;11-year-old children recruited from six primary schools in Bristol.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Parents perceived that a lack of appropriate spaces in which to be active, safety, traffic, the proximity of friends and older children affected children's ability to be independently physically active. The final year of primary school was perceived as a period when children should be afforded increased licence. Parents managed physical activity licence by placing time limits on activity, restricting activity to close to home, only allowing activity in groups or under adult supervision.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Strategies are needed to build children's licence to be independently active; this could be achieved by developing parental self-efficacy to allow children to be active and developing structures such as safe routes to parks and safer play areas. Future programmes could make use of traffic-calming programmes as catalysts for safe independent physical activity.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jago, R., Thompson, J. L., Page, A. S., Brockman, R., Cartwright, K., Fox, K. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 06:43:00 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/pubmed/fdp053</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Licence to be active: parental concerns and 10-11-year-old children's ability to be independently physically active]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Faculty of Public Health of the Royal Colleges of Physicians of the United Kingdom</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>31</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>477</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>472</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Healthy Improvement</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/4/478?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Health and social care responses to the Department of Health Heatwave Plan]]></title>
<link>http://jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/4/478?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>The increasing risk of heatwaves in England poses a particular threat to the health of elderly people. A National Heatwave Plan has been produced to ensure that adaptation plans are established. The objective was to explore the perceptions of frontline statutory and voluntary sector staff on the feasibility of implementing the Heatwave Plan for elderly people in the community.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Semi-structured interviews and focus groups with 109 health, social care and voluntary staff from three London Boroughs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Few frontline staff were aware of the Plan. Most respondents did not perceive heatwaves to be a sufficiently frequent event to require prioritization within their routine summer workloads. They highlighted the complexities associated with defining vulnerability and identifying vulnerable individuals as well as barriers to implementation of the Plan. Respondents suggested a multi-faceted approach to interventions including a public health campaign, community engagement and increasing the responsiveness of statutory services.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The issues highlighted could hinder effective implementation of the Heatwave Plan. Ensuring continuity of care so that timely information can be recorded and disseminated may address the problems associated with shifting vulnerability. Best practice with respect to inter-sectoral collaboration should be identified and innovative multi-faceted interventions should be designed and evaluated.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Abrahamson, V., Raine, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 06:43:00 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/pubmed/fdp059</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Health and social care responses to the Department of Health Heatwave Plan]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Faculty of Public Health of the Royal Colleges of Physicians of the United Kingdom</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>31</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>489</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>478</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Healthy Improvement</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/4/490?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Functional health literacy among primary health-care patients: data from the Belgrade pilot study]]></title>
<link>http://jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/4/490?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Over the last decade, health literacy has become a vibrant area of research. Our objective was to evaluate health literacy and its association with socio-demographic variables, self-perception of health and the presence of chronic conditions in primary health-care patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A cross-sectional study among 120 patients was conducted in two primary health-care centers. The test of functional health literacy in adults, a 50-item reading comprehension and 17-item numerical ability test (score, 0&ndash;100) were administered. Chi-square test and logistic regression analyses were applied.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Inadequate and marginal health literacy existed in 43 participants (41.0%), and adequate health literacy was present in 62 participants (59.0%). Functional health literacy was significantly different by location, gender, age, marital status, employment, education, material status, self-perception of health and presence of chronic conditions. Based on the multivariate analysis, health literacy was significantly associated with the participant's age (odds ratio [OR], 4.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.41&ndash;9.80; <I>P</I> = 0.000), level of education (OR, 4.48; 95% CI, 1.73&ndash;11.57; <I>P</I> = 0.002) and chronic conditions (OR, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.16&ndash;3.11; <I>P</I> = 0.010).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>These results provide evidence that limitations in functional health literacy are widespread among primary health-care patients and encourage efforts for further monitoring. Low health literacy may impair a patient's understanding of health messages and limit their ability to attend to their medical problems.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jovic-Vranes, A., Bjegovic-Mikanovic, V., Marinkovic, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 06:43:00 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/pubmed/fdp049</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Functional health literacy among primary health-care patients: data from the Belgrade pilot study]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Faculty of Public Health of the Royal Colleges of Physicians of the United Kingdom</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>31</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>495</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>490</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Healthy Improvement</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/4/496?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The statewide burden of obesity, smoking, low income and chronic diseases in the United States]]></title>
<link>http://jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/4/496?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>We developed an estimation equation of EuroQol EQ-5D index scores from the Healthy Days measures of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for use in burden of disease and cost-effectiveness studies in population subgroups. This study estimated EQ-5D scores, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and quality-adjusted life expectancy (QALE) for the USA and the individual states.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We estimated the EQ-5D scores for respondents from the 2000&ndash;2003 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. We calculated QALYs and QALE lost to morbidity due to obesity/overweight, smoking, low income and chronic diseases.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The mean EQ-5D score for US adults was 0.870. The mean scores ranged from 0.826 (West Virginia) to 0.902 (Hawaii). Smoking contributed from 5.6 (Utah) to 12.3 (Kentucky) percent, obesity/overweight 5.4 (South Dakota) to 13.8 (Louisiana) percent, low income 16.6 (Hawaii) to 39.9 (South Carolina) percent and chronic diseases 8.7 (Minnesota) to 22.9 (Tennessee) percent of explainable QALYs lost. These risks contributed the greatest proportion of explainable QALYs and QALE lost in Kentucky, Tennessee and South Carolina.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>We estimated the burden of disease contributed by selected risk factors. Currently, such data are unavailable but are needed to set targets for reducing modifiable health risks and eliminating health disparities among at-risk populations.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jia, H., Lubetkin, E. I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 06:43:00 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/pubmed/fdp012</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The statewide burden of obesity, smoking, low income and chronic diseases in the United States]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Faculty of Public Health of the Royal Colleges of Physicians of the United Kingdom</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>31</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>505</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>496</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Healthy Improvement</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/4/506?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Impact of antisocial lifestyle on health: chronic disability and death by middle age]]></title>
<link>http://jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/4/506?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>An antisocial lifestyle is associated with injury but also with less organic illness up to the age of 32. It is not known if these associations persist into the fifth decade.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Injury and illness data were collected prospectively in the longitudinal Cambridge study in delinquent development at age 43&ndash;48. Hypotheses were that childhood predictors of antisocial behaviour and offending and antisocial behaviour at ages up to 32 would be associated with poorer health at age 48.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Childhood and parental predictors of offending, self-reported delinquency at age 32 and convictions were significantly associated with death and disability by age 48. A model comprising three factors: any antisocial behaviour and any parental risk factor at age 8&ndash;10 and any antisocial behaviour at age 27&ndash;32 best discriminated death or disability. Two factors: conviction between ages 10&ndash;18 and any antisocial behaviour at age 8&ndash;10 discriminated almost as well.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Death and disability by age 48 were strongly associated with antisocial behaviour at ages 8&ndash;10 and 27&ndash;32, convictions and impulsivity during adolescence and parental predictors of offending at age 8&ndash;10. Preventing childhood and adolescent antisocial behaviour and offending may also prolong life and prevent disability among those who would otherwise offend.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shepherd, J. P., Shepherd, I., Newcombe, R. G., Farrington, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 06:43:00 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/pubmed/fdp054</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Impact of antisocial lifestyle on health: chronic disability and death by middle age]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Faculty of Public Health of the Royal Colleges of Physicians of the United Kingdom</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>31</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>511</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>506</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Healthy Improvement</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/4/512?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Selective decrease in consultations and antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory tract infections in UK primary care up to 2006]]></title>
<link>http://jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/4/512?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>The aim of this study was to estimate trends in primary care consultations and antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory tract infections (RTIs) in the UK from 1997 to 2006.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Data were analysed for 100 000 subjects registered with 78 family practices in the UK General Practice Research Database; the numbers of consultations for RTI and associated antibiotic prescriptions were enumerated.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The consultation rate for RTI declined in females from 442.2 per 1000 registered patients in 1997 to 330.9 in 2006, and in males from 318.5 to 249.0. The rate of consultations for colds, rhinitis and upper respiratory tract infection (URTI) declined by 4.2 (95% CI 2.3&ndash;6.1) per 1000 per year in females and by 3.6 (2.3&ndash;4.8) in males. The rate of antibiotic prescribing for RTI was higher in females and declined by 8.5 (2.0&ndash;15.1) per 1000 in females and 6.7 (2.7&ndash;10.8) in males. For colds, rhinitis and URTI, the proportion of consultations with antibiotics was prescribed declined by 1.7% per year in females and 1.8% in males.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Decreasing frequency of consultation and antibiotic prescription for colds, rhinitis and &lsquo;URTI&rsquo; continues to drive a reduction in the rate of antibiotic utilization for RTIs.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gulliford, M., Latinovic, R., Charlton, J., Little, P., van Staa, T., Ashworth, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 06:43:00 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/pubmed/fdp081</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Selective decrease in consultations and antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory tract infections in UK primary care up to 2006]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Faculty of Public Health of the Royal Colleges of Physicians of the United Kingdom</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>31</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>520</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>512</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Healthy Service Quality</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/4/521?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reliability of needs assessments in the community care of older people: impact of the single assessment process in England]]></title>
<link>http://jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/4/521?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>The single assessment process (SAP) for older people, introduced in England across health and social care agencies from April 2004, aimed at improving assessment processes. We examined the impact of this policy in terms of the reliability of needs identification within statutory social services assessments.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>An observational study compared the accuracy of needs identification in samples of older people before and after SAP introduction. Participants, at risk of entering care homes, were interviewed using standardized measures. Needs elicited from interviews were compared with those from statutory social services assessments to ascertain the reliability of needs identification at both times. Inter-rater reliabilities were calculated using the kappa (<I>k</I>) statistic. A Chi-squared statistic tested the equality of kappa values pre- and post-SAP.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Most needs were identified more reliably after SAP introduction (range adjusted <I>k</I> = 0.05&ndash;0.58) than before (range adjusted <I>k</I> = &ndash;0.09 to 0.28), this being statistically significant for 9 out of 15 needs. Depression, and associated apathy, was an exception.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Statutory social services assessments better captured need following the introduction of the SAP. However, the extent to which these findings can be attributed to SAP introduction is limited by the introduction of multiple policy initiatives throughout the study period.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Clarkson, P., Abendstern, M., Sutcliffe, C., Hughes, J., Challis, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 06:43:01 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/pubmed/fdp035</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reliability of needs assessments in the community care of older people: impact of the single assessment process in England]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Faculty of Public Health of the Royal Colleges of Physicians of the United Kingdom</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>31</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>529</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>521</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Healthy Service Quality</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/4/530?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Perceived unmet need for hospitalization service among elderly Chinese people in Zhejiang province]]></title>
<link>http://jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/4/530?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>In this study, we determined the prevalence of unmet need for hospitalization service and the characteristics of the elderly with this unmet need in Zhejiang province, China.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Data were collected from a random sample of 4046 Chinese aged 60 years and older in Zhejiang province. Based on the Andersen-Newman service utilization framework, multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine independent effects of these variables on the likelihood of having an unmet need for hospitalization service.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Overall, the prevalence of unmet need was 16.2% for hospitalization service. Among predisposing factors, only educational level was statistically significant. Individuals with higher education were less likely to report unmet needs. Among enabling factors, residential area, social support, personal yearly income and personal healthcare expenditure were strongly associated with the presence of unmet need. Those with less enabling resources (e.g. residing in rural areas) were more likely to report unmet need [Odds ratio (OR) = 1.5&ndash;6.5]. All the need factors, except for physical function, were strongly associated with the presence of unmet need. Seniors in poorer health (e.g. in fair or poor health) were more likely to report unmet need than their counterparts in better health (OR = 1.5&ndash;2.8).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>In spite of relatively high insurance coverage rates, unmet need for hospitalization service remains high among the elderly people of Zhejiang province in China. Application of comprehensive intervention strategies such as conducting health education, creating social support, promoting community participation and promoting inter-sectional cooperation may be more effective in reducing unmet need for hospitalization service.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Junfang, W., Biao, Z., Weijun, Z., Zhang, S., Yinyin, W., Chen, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 06:43:01 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/pubmed/fdp007</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Perceived unmet need for hospitalization service among elderly Chinese people in Zhejiang province]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Faculty of Public Health of the Royal Colleges of Physicians of the United Kingdom</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>31</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>540</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>530</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Healthy Service Quality</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/4/541?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The influence of NICE guidance on the uptake of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer]]></title>
<link>http://jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/4/541?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) did not recommend laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in 2000, but updated its guidance in 2006. We investigated the uptake of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer before and after NICE guidance in 2000 and 2006.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Using hospital episode statistics (HES) data for men and women in England, the annual percentages of open and laparoscopic resections for colorectal cancer were calculated between 1997 and 2007.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A total of 182 191 patient spells containing a diagnosis of colorectal cancer plus either a procedure code for surgical resection of the large bowel and/or a laparoscopic procedure were identified: 177 537 (97.4%) were for open resection; 4193 (2.3%) for laparoscopic surgery; and for 461 (0.3%) the procedure was unclear. The annual number of open procedures performed remained stable, whereas the numbers of laparoscopic resections increased steadily.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Despite NICE guidance in 2000 recommending open surgery for colorectal cancer, there was a continuous increase in the laparoscopic approach in England, starting 3 years before the modified guidance supporting this technique. Whether NICE guidance was an effective deterrent and the guidelines protected patients cannot be determined from this retrospective study, but a similar staged approach for the adoption of other complex laparoscopic procedures is recommended.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Green, C. J., Maxwell, R., Verne, J., Martin, R. M., Blazeby, J. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 06:43:01 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/pubmed/fdp027</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The influence of NICE guidance on the uptake of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Faculty of Public Health of the Royal Colleges of Physicians of the United Kingdom</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>31</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>545</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>541</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Healthy Service Quality</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/4/546?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[How much do operational processes affect hospital inpatient discharge rates?]]></title>
<link>http://jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/4/546?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>The objective of this study is to determine the effect of day of the week, holiday, team admission and rotation schedules, individual attending physicians and their length of coverage on daily team discharge rates.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We conducted a retrospective analysis of the General Internal Medicine (GIM) inpatient service at our institution for years 2005 and 2006, which included 5088 patients under GIM care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Weekend discharge rate was more than 50% lower compared with reference rates whereas Friday rates were 24% higher. Holiday Monday discharge rates were 65% lower than regular Mondays, with an increase in pre-holiday discharge rates. Teams that were on-call or that were on call the next day had 15% higher discharge rates compared with reference whereas teams that were post-call had 20% lower rates. Individual attending physicians and length of attending coverage contributed small variations in discharge rates. Resident scheduling was not a significant predictor of discharge rates.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Day of the week and holidays followed by team organization and scheduling are significant predictors of daily variation in discharge rates. Introducing greater holiday and weekend capacity as well as reorganizing internal processes such as admitting and attending schedules may potentially optimize discharge rates.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wong, H., Wu, R. C., Tomlinson, G., Caesar, M., Abrams, H., Carter, M. W., Morra, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 06:43:01 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/pubmed/fdp044</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[How much do operational processes affect hospital inpatient discharge rates?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Faculty of Public Health of the Royal Colleges of Physicians of the United Kingdom</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>31</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>553</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>546</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Healthy Service Quality</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/4/554?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[False-positive mammography and depressed mood in a screening population: findings from the New Hampshire Mammography Network]]></title>
<link>http://jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/4/554?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>False positives occur in approximately 11% of screening mammographies in the USA and may be associated with psychologic sequelae.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We sought to examine the association of false-positive mammography with depressed mood among women in a screening population. Using data from a state-based mammography registry, women who completed a standardized questionnaire between 7 May 2001 and 2 June 2003, a follow-up questionnaire between 19 June 2003 and 8 October 2004 and who received at least one screening mammogram during this interval were identified. False positives were examined in relation to depressed mood.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Eligibility criteria were met by 13 491 women with a median age of 63.9 (SD = 9.6). In the study population, 2107 (15.62%) experienced at least one false positive mammogram and 450 (3.34%) met criteria for depressed mood. Depressed mood was not significantly associated with false positives in the overall population [OR = 0.96; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.72&ndash;1.28], but this association was seen among Non-White women (OR = 3.23; 95% CI = 1.32&ndash;7.91).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Depressed mood may differentially affect some populations as a harm associated with screening mammography.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gibson, C. J., Weiss, J., Goodrich, M., Onega, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 06:43:01 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/pubmed/fdp064</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[False-positive mammography and depressed mood in a screening population: findings from the New Hampshire Mammography Network]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Faculty of Public Health of the Royal Colleges of Physicians of the United Kingdom</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>31</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>560</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>554</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Healthy Service Quality</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/4/561?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Process of neonatal tetanus elimination in Nepal]]></title>
<link>http://jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/4/561?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>In late 2005, Nepal demonstrated through surveys that it had reached the World Health Organization criterion for having eliminated neonatal tetanus (NT), i.e. NT cases occurred at a rate of less than 1 per 1000 live births in every district. This paper summarizes how a combination of strategies contributed to this success.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>For each of the 4 strategies (clean delivery, routine immunization, supplemental immunization campaigns, and surveillance) activities before and after 2000 are described and achievements are summarized using published and unpublished data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Through routine immunization of pregnant women with tetanus toxoid (TT), NT cases had decreased substantially by 1999, but the final push was provided through the national TT supplemental immunization activities in 2000&ndash;2004, which raised the proportion of children protected at birth against tetanus to above 80%. Fewer than 20% of deliveries take place with trained assistance. Although NT surveillance has improved since the extensive Acute Flaccid Paralysis/Polio surveillance infrastructure in Nepal was made available for the NT elimination initiative, it is likely that a number of cases still occur without being reported, particularly in rural areas.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>NT elimination was achieved in 2005 in Nepal, but activities must continue and be strengthened to ensure that NT incidence will not increase in the future. The introduction and further expansion of school-based immunization will, in combination with diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis vaccine given in infancy, reduce the need for future cohorts of childbearing age women to be immunized at every pregnancy. However, booster doses will still need to be given in early adulthood to ensure ongoing protection.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vandelaer, J., Partridge, J., Suvedi, B. K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 06:43:01 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/pubmed/fdp039</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Process of neonatal tetanus elimination in Nepal]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Faculty of Public Health of the Royal Colleges of Physicians of the United Kingdom</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>31</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>565</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>561</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Health Protection</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/4/566?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Using encounters versus episodes in syndromic surveillance]]></title>
<link>http://jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/4/566?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Automated electronic medical records may be useful for syndromic surveillance to quickly detect infectious disease outbreaks. Some syndromic surveillance systems include every encounter in the analysis, whereas others exclude individuals' repeat encounters within the same syndrome occurring within a short period of time, with the rationale that these represent follow-up visits rather than new episodes of illness.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We evaluate the effect of keeping all encounters as compared with removing repeat encounters. Using the prospective space&ndash;time permutation scan statistic, we performed daily analyses on all encounters versus on episodes defined as encounters new within 2, 6 or 12 weeks. Data were taken from a Massachusetts Health Maintenance Organization (HMO) for the calendar year 1999 for four different syndromes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>We found extensive disagreement in the number of signals detected: 70, 68, 21 and 15 signals when using all encounters versus 15&ndash;20, 3, 4&ndash;5 and 0 signals when using only new episodes for lower respiratory, lower gastrointestinal, upper gastrointestinal and neurologic syndromes, respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Using all encounters in syndromic surveillance may not only create too many signals but may also miss some signals by masking the anomalies generated by actual episodes. However, it is also possible to miss signals when using episodes.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jung, I., Kulldorff, M., Kleinman, K. P., Yih, W. K., Platt, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 06:43:01 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/pubmed/fdp040</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Using encounters versus episodes in syndromic surveillance]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Faculty of Public Health of the Royal Colleges of Physicians of the United Kingdom</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>31</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>572</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>566</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Health Protection</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/4/573?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[What causes H5N1 avian influenza? Lay perceptions of H5N1 aetiology in South East and East Asia]]></title>
<link>http://jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/4/573?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Health education to reduce population poultry exposures has limited effect. Lay beliefs about H5N1 highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) causes could provide insights helpful for improving public health interventions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Qualitative interviews of poultry farmers, retailers, market stall holders and consumers in Hong Kong (<I>n</I> = 20), Guangzhou (<I>n</I> = 25), Vietnam (<I>n</I> = 38) and Thailand (<I>n</I> = 40) were conducted using purposive sampling and analysed using ethnographic principles.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Each location produced three comparable themes: &lsquo;viruses&rsquo;: HPAI exemplified a periodic, natural, disease process therefore, deserving little concern. For some, science had &lsquo;discovered&rsquo; something long known to farmers and lived with for generations. Others believe the virus to be new. Viral ecology was reasonably well understood among farmers, but less so by retailers and consumers; &lsquo;husbandry practices&rsquo; included poor hygiene, overcrowding and industrial farming, modern commercial feed and veterinary drugs; &lsquo;vulnerability factors&rsquo; included uncontrollable &lsquo;external&rsquo; explanations involving the weather, seasonal changes, bird migrations and pollution.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Lay explanations were generally ecologically consistent. Nonetheless, beliefs that HPAI is a normal, recurrent process, external factors and roles of industrialized poultry rearing countered health worker claims of H5N1 seriousness for smallholders. These causal beliefs incorporate contemporary models of H5N1 ecology, but in a manner that contradicts public health efforts at control.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Liao, Q. Y., Lam, W. W. T., Dang, V. T., Jiang, C. Q., Udomprasertgul, V., Fielding, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 06:43:01 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/pubmed/fdp043</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[What causes H5N1 avian influenza? Lay perceptions of H5N1 aetiology in South East and East Asia]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Faculty of Public Health of the Royal Colleges of Physicians of the United Kingdom</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>31</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>581</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>573</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Health Protection</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/4/582?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Residential Anonymous Linking Fields (RALFs): a novel information infrastructure to study the interaction between the environment and individuals' health]]></title>
<link>http://jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/4/582?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>The necessity of aggregating health data over areas can impede our understanding of health determinants.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We demonstrate the possibility of creating anonymous links between individual residences and the local environment using digital map data and a data linkage system.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Digital map data were used successfully to anonymously link 1.3 million addresses to the local environment. The data linkage system allows detailed environment data surrounding each residence to be linked both to each resident therein and to their medical records.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Local environment data specific to each house can be effectively and anonymously linked to the population registered with the National Health Service. Our integrated approach potentially enables flexible fine-scale, large-area observational studies of communities and health.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rodgers, S. E., Lyons, R. A., Dsilva, R., Jones, K. H., Brooks, C. J., Ford, D. V., John, G., Verplancke, J.-P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 06:43:01 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/pubmed/fdp041</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Residential Anonymous Linking Fields (RALFs): a novel information infrastructure to study the interaction between the environment and individuals' health]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Faculty of Public Health of the Royal Colleges of Physicians of the United Kingdom</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>31</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>588</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>582</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Health Intelligence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/4/589?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The NIHR public health research programme: developing evidence for public health decision-makers]]></title>
<link>http://jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/4/589?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Milne, R., Law, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 06:43:01 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/pubmed/fdp095</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The NIHR public health research programme: developing evidence for public health decision-makers]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Faculty of Public Health of the Royal Colleges of Physicians of the United Kingdom</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>31</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>592</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>589</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Occasional Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/4/593?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Enhancing methodological developments for Cochrane Public Health Reviews: the role of exemplar reviews]]></title>
<link>http://jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/4/593?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Armstrong, R., Doyle, J., Saith, R., Anderson, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 06:43:01 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/pubmed/fdp100</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Enhancing methodological developments for Cochrane Public Health Reviews: the role of exemplar reviews]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Faculty of Public Health of the Royal Colleges of Physicians of the United Kingdom</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>31</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>595</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>593</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Cochrane Update</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/4/596?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[NICE Public health guidance: what's new?]]></title>
<link>http://jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/4/596?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Killoran, A., White, P., Younger, T., Fischer, A., Millward, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 06:43:01 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/pubmed/fdp103</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[NICE Public health guidance: what's new?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Faculty of Public Health of the Royal Colleges of Physicians of the United Kingdom</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>31</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>598</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>596</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>NICE Update</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/4/599?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Concepts of Epidemiology: Integrating the Ideas, Theories, Principles and Methods of Epidemiology. Second Edition]]></title>
<link>http://jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/4/599?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pilkington, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 06:43:01 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/pubmed/fdp028</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Concepts of Epidemiology: Integrating the Ideas, Theories, Principles and Methods of Epidemiology. Second Edition]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Faculty of Public Health of the Royal Colleges of Physicians of the United Kingdom</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>31</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>600</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>599</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Book Reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/4/599-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Donaldsons' Essential Public Health. Third Edition]]></title>
<link>http://jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/31/4/599-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hillier, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 06:43:01 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/pubmed/fdp084</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Donaldsons' Essential Public Health. Third Edition]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Faculty of Public Health of the Royal Colleges of Physicians of the United Kingdom</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>31</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>599</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>599</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Book Reviews</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>